Thank you for letting us know your decision.
We confess that we're a bit surprised (and disappointed)
that you "cannot accept your correspondence for publication",
and we're hoping you could tell us why you decided not to
publish it. One reason we're surprised is that we submitted
the above note as one half of a pair of correspondences (the
other was JCO/2007/151951). Since both correspondences dealt
with errors in papers appearing in JCO that used related
approaches, we had submitted our notes as a set. The other
was accepted 2 weeks ago.

Here, we thought we had identified and documented several
serious errors in a JCO publication, which we were seeking
to address.

Did you think that our argument was flawed, and that the
intitial paper was correct?
Did you think that the problems identified were too minor
to merit concern?
Did you think that our paper was unclear?
Did the initial authors respond in such a way that you
judged our concerns to be moot?

We'd really like to know.
Thanks in advance for any help you can give us.

Sincerely,

Keith A Baggerly